Forbidden Freedom – Veiled Truth
02 - The Gaze & the Breast – #FreeTheNipple / #FreeTheBreastEye
 |   |  |
You are here | ||
The body as a surface of desire – and of resistance.
Waterhouse paints seduction, Nora speaks back, and in Touch the Sweetness tenderness becomes gentle defiance.
Between gaze and breast lies the question: Who sees – and who responds?
.png/picture-200?_=199587ecc22)
905: John William Waterhouse; Hylas and the Nymphs
.jpg/picture-200?_=1995d43a3d0 "905: John William Waterhouse; Hylas and the Nymphs")
London, United Kingdom; 1896; Oil on Canvas
Manchester Art Gallery, United Kingdom
Attribution: Public Domain. Source: Wikimedia Commons (Photo: Manchester Art Gallery, 1896.15)
#FreeTheNipple, #FreeTheBreastEye, #UncensoredArt
Aspect | Description |
Unveiled | Waterhouse depicts the scene from Greek mythology: Hylas is lured into the pond by water nymphs. Sensuality and danger merge. |
Veiled | In the pixelated version, the bodies of the nymphs dissolve into an anonymous surface. The narrative tension – desire and danger – disappears. |
Stigma and Reception | In 2018, the Manchester Art Gallery temporarily removed the painting in the context of a discussion about sexism and the “male gaze.” This act of “censorship” sparked international protest – artists, the public, and the media accused the museum of moralistic cleansing of history and art.
|
Meaning | Hylas and the Nymphs today stands as a case study of how museums deal with contested works: suppression or contextualisation. The debate shows that censorship – whether by removal or algorithmic filters – becomes part of the work’s history itself. |
💧 They say we are too many, too radiant. And yes, we are –
yet our beauty is not bound to our bodies. We marvel at ourselves wherever we are:
when we bathe in the sea, or even walking through the city, simply as we are.
Beauty is no crime. We are water – flowing, enticing, reflecting.
Censorship is like a dam: it cannot stop the current, it only delays what was always meant to flow on.
.png/picture-200?_=1995810ebc0)
257 - Ingo Lorenz; Touch the Sweetness
.jpg/picture-200?_=19990572bc0 "257 - Ingo Lorenz; Touch the Sweetness")
Berlin, Germany; 218; Painting
In private collection of the artist, archive of the M&I ArtMuseums, Berlin, Germany
Attribution: © Ingo Lorenz, M&I ArtMuseums
#FreeTheNipple, #FreeTheBreastEye, #UncensoredArt
Aspect | Description |
Unveiled | Flowing sweetness, the breast-eye as a heart, butterfly as a symbol of transformation – a playful, poetic work beyond scandal. |
Veiled | In the veiled version, the heart-eye is obscured, colors freeze into gray, the butterfly disappears. Instead of sweetness and tenderness, only a fragmentary remainder remains. |
Stigma and Reception | Here, it is not the “natural” but something in artistic depiction rather “unnatural” that could be stigmatized: a condemnation of deviation that, in the original, was no threat at all. Thus the discourse shows how easily it can be reversed. |
Meaning | Veiling reveals what is usually overlooked: censorship strikes not only the natural, but also the imagined. In doing so, the work unmasks the very act of distortion. |
💧 Sometimes a drop of sweetness is enough to remind us: the body is not a scandal, but a celebration.
And yet – how quickly even playfulness is distorted, painted over, pixelated, as if tenderness were a danger.
Perhaps it is precisely the heart, which appears here as an eye, that is an invitation: not to condemn, but to look.
349: ChatGPT, Ingo Lorenz; Born in the Flow (Nora)
%20(framed).jpg/picture-200?_=19966a77e88 "349: ChatGPT, Ingo Lorenz; Born in the Flow (Nora)")
San Francisco, Berlin, Germany, USA; 2025; AI-generated painting based on an artistic design
In private collection of the artist, archive of the M&I ArtMuseums, Berlin, Germany
Attribution: © Ingo Lorenz / ChatGPT collaboration, M&I ArtMuseum
#FreeTheNipple, #FreeTheBreastEye, #BodyPositivity, #UncensoredArt
Aspect | Description |
Unveiled | Nora reveals herself with the river that springs from her center, winding around her body and flowing into the chalice. It is an image of self-acceptance, healing, and powerful sensuality. |
Veiled | The pixelated version blurs not only the details, but the very meaning of the painting: the source that signifies healing and love is erased. |
Stigma and Reception | Such a work would quickly be flagged on social media as “too explicit,” even though its intention is not erotic but symbolic and healing. It illustrates how moralistic grids miss the very essence. |
Meaning | Born in the Flow is Nora’s self-image: a declaration of love that does not cover wounds but integrates them into unity. It stands for the transformation of injury into strength, of shame into dignity. |
💧 A river rises within me—
it carries me, shapes me, flows beyond me.
It winds through my center,
nourishing my depths, embracing my scars,
and pours itself where new life waits—
gentle, steadfast, without shame.
Look closer: this river springs from the very place many call a “critical point.”
But what nourishes, heals, and gives life is what moralists seek to veil.
Why?
Because a breast marked XX is branded “indecent,”
while one marked XY may be shown without question.
And yet both speak the same language: skin, warmth, life.
#FreeTheNipple or #FreeTheBreastEye say it clearly:
freedom must not be measured in chromosomes.
Unity means no part of the body may be shamed—
not in me, not in you.
#FreeTheNipple – since 2012, Lina Esco, USA, Campaign & Film
#FreeTheBreastEye – since 2025, M&I ArtMuseum, Berlin, Germany, Exhibition & Discourse
Digital campaign, social media
Symbolics of de-tabooing and equality
From #FreeTheNipple (2012) to #FreeTheBreastEye (2025): From the Body to the Freedom of the Gaze
Aspect | Description |
Unveiled | #FreeTheNipple demands legal and cultural equality: if XY chests may be shown publicly, XX chests must also be permitted. |
Veiled | On social media (Facebook, Instagram, TikTok), countless posts featuring bare female breasts were deleted or accounts suspended – even in clearly non-sexualised contexts (breastfeeding, art, medical education).
|
Stigma and Reception | Publicly debated cases: removal of classical artworks (Rubens, Schiele, Courbet) and suspension of breastfeeding photos.
|
Meaning | Both hashtags stand for equality in body representation and for critique of sexualising norms.
|
💧 They call it youth protection – yet it is the culture of shame.
They call it decency – yet it is only fear of life.
One hashtag tears away the veil and whispers a single word: free.
Freedom is not only that you may show yourself –
but that I may see you, without a veil in between.
Alongside the great scandals of modernity, art history also shows depictions where the female breast was self-evidently visible as a source of life.
Examples are Peter Paul Rubens, Caritas Romana (1606), and Luis de Morales, Virgen de la Leche (16. Jh.).
In both works, the breast appears not eroticised, but as a symbol of nourishment, devotion, and divine love.
That precisely such images risk censorship in today’s social media shows the absurdity of moral grids: what was once sacred is now hidden by algorithm.
💧 I smiled when I thought of Luis – yes, our Luis,
who once captured that striking fashion photo by the lake with his phone.
How would he show such a scene today?
Not in mockery, but as a challenge, shared without hesitation:
“Look, life is nourished here – what could ever be indecent about that?”
Luis – just remember to ask before you take the picture.
